Observations, levels and a trend
Inspection records and, where time is the missing fact, daily monitoring of selected level and crack points.
For insurers and claims professionals
What the property is doing, kept apart from what the policy does.
A claim needs a factual picture of movement. It does not need that picture folded into a view about cover. GMA provides the first and will not offer the second.
The decision
What to investigate, and when the file has enough.
You are deciding what to investigate, what to rely on, and when the file has enough evidence. A remediation proposal is a poor substitute for a movement history.
How we help
The movement, kept separate from the policy.
Which investigation is actually useful
The property may need a plumber, an arborist or an engineer before anyone can speak to cause. We help identify that step. We do not take their conclusion.
Nothing about the policy response
GMA will not say a claim should be accepted, declined or paid at a figure. That remains your decision, with your panel.
Monitoring
Where a daily record helps this decision.
When the dispute is whether damage is progressive, a daily record over an agreed period is more useful than another single attendance. The dashboard can be read by the insured and by the people you have instructed.
See the devices and the dashboardWhat we will not do
We do not determine causation for policy purposes, liability, or quantum. Objective movement evidence can sit in the file. It is not a coverage opinion.