Access planned around occupation
Device locations and inspection timing are set around how the building is lived in, not around the most convenient empty room.
For aged care and retirement living
Evidence that respects the fact people live here.
A cracked wall in an occupied home is not the same job as a vacant inspection. Resident disruption, decanting and capital all have to be justified by what the building is actually doing.
The decision
Whether disruption is justified now.
Boards and operators are asked to approve disruptive work on buildings people cannot simply leave. The proportionate question is whether movement is active enough to justify that disruption now.
How we help
Planned around the people who live there.
A reason to proceed, or a reason to wait
Daily readings can show a stable pattern as clearly as an active one. Both are useful when the alternative is a major program.
Capital with a record attached
When works are justified, the same points can keep recording afterwards, so performance is measured rather than assumed on the day the contractor leaves.
Monitoring
Where a daily record helps this decision.
Monitoring is often the least disruptive way to answer “is this still moving?”. It does not remove the need for clinical, compliance or engineering advice. It stops those decisions being made from a single walk-through.
See the devices and the dashboardWhat we will not do
GMA does not audit care standards, building compliance or resident safety systems. We report on movement evidence and the practical next step that evidence supports.